How it works
How it works¶
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ INGESTED SIGNALS │
├───────────────────────────┬────────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────┤
│ GitHub Events │ Linear/Jira │ Google Calendar │
│ • Issues, PRs & Commits │ • Tickets │ • Out-of-Office │
│ • CI/CD Pipelines │ • Objectives │ • On-call Schedule │
│ • Code Reviews │ • Owners │ • Meeting Conflicts │
└───────────────────────────┴────────────────────────┴───────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ AGENTIC GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK FOR DEVOPS TOOLCHAINS │
│ Context-Aware, Adaptive Approach │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ 1. CONTEXTUALIZATION & DATA ENRICHMENT │
│ • Normalize events across GitHub, Linear, and Calendar │
│ • Link PRs with tickets, teams, and deployment context │
│ • Enrich with actor roles, history, and code sensitivity │
│ • Add runtime context (OOO status, reviewer availability) │
│ │
│ 2. AGENTIC RULE EVALUATION & REASONING │
│ • Reasoning agents interpret natural language rules │
│ • Infer developer intent (hotfix vs refactor vs feature) │
│ • Match PR diffs against ticket objectives and scope │
│ • Evaluate risk based on change + actor + timing context │
│ • Auto-reassign reviewers when unavailable (OOO detection) │
│ • Trigger escalation paths per rule configuration │
│ │
│ 3. ADAPTIVE ENFORCEMENT & FEEDBACK MEMORY │
│ • Choose enforcement path: allow, flag, or block │
│ • Build confidence scores from past outcomes │
│ • Learn from team overrides, interventions, and policy drift │
│ • Store violations as first-class objects with full context │
│ │
│ 4. CONTEXT PROPAGATION & TEAM ROUTING │
│ • Send Slack alerts with threaded decisions and actions │
│ • Auto-comment or assign in Linear/Jira tickets │
│ • Push signals to audit trails, dashboards, and scoring systems │
│ • Update contributor leaderboards for team visibility │
│ │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ OUTPUT CHANNELS │
├─────────────────┬───────────────┬────────────────┬───────────────┬─────────────────┤
│ Slack │ Linear / │ Google │ Audit │ Dashboards │
│ Notifications │ Jira │ Calendar │ Trail │ & Analytics │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ • Threaded │ • Auto │ • Real-time │ • Agent │ • Policy │
│ alerts │ comments │ OOO check │ decisions │ compliance │
│ • Action │ • Task │ • Schedule │ • Violation │ • Team │
│ buttons │ assignment │ conflicts │ logs │ leaderboards │
│ • Context │ • Status │ • Meeting │ • Rule │ • Risk │
│ threads │ updates │ awareness │ evolution │ scoring │
└─────────────────┴───────────────┴────────────────┴───────────────┴─────────────────┘
What a day looks like with Warestack (Impact)¶
Warestack embeds into your team's daily workflow—flagging risks and automating checks before issues hit production or compliance is violated.
A typical day:
-
Morning:
Team leads review the dashboard of PRs that bypassed rules or need escalation. Slack alerts already routed some to the right reviewer overnight. -
During the day:
Developers receive context-aware alerts on Slack if their PRs miss review thresholds or affect sensitive areas.
Rules auto-adjust if reviewers are OOO or code owners are missing. -
Evening / Weekend:
Warestack auto-blocks deployment attempts outside permitted windows unless labeled urgent with justification.
Agents log actions for audit, without interrupting velocity. -
End of sprint:
The team views a leaderboard of top contributors and teams who followed policies. Governance is visible, fair, and tied to behavior—not checklists.